Universal Search: comScore declares that marketers must quickly adapt and create videos and images that are relevant to their target customers

In NYC the SES (Search Engine Strategies) exhibit was all about Google Universal!

comScore announced the first stats around Universal Search.

“during one week in January 2008. During this period we observed over 220 million Google searches containing a universal result, out of 1.2 billion searches overall:

  1. 17% of the queries had a universal result
  2. 16% of total Google clicks were sourced from a page where a universal result was present
  3. 14% of paid clicks were sourced from result pages where a universal result was present”

Comscore stats

comScore also declared:
“This is not an insignificant number and shows that universal / mash-up / blended search results are clearly now in play. It will be interesting to track how this grows (or not) over time.”
“the shift from 17% total universal search results to 14% paid clicks is a vital stat. In other research situations, a move of 3 percentile points is hardly worth mentioning. In the world of search – where decimal points of change move tens of millions in commerce – it’s a big deal. It means that the presence of a universal results yield fewer clicks and will create more competition among search marketers”

AND SOMETHING BIG FOR US:

“It will be incumbent upon the marketers to quickly adapt and create videos and images that are relevant to the consumer and make them available to the search engines”

So if you’re marketer and you’re around just give us a call…We can definitely help you! :)

Let’s Ask Google and Youtube a few questions : Marissa (Mayer), Matt (Cutts) if you are around, please talk to us… (Part 1)

Marissa and MattHello Google / Youtube Swat teams.

First of all CONGRATS! I think what you are doing is awesome, even though I’d like it if you moved faster in terms of video and search (naturally, because internet video is my business!). And that’s the goal of this post…

Here are my questions for you about videos, SEO, SERPs and more generally about your major evolution with Google Universal.

If one of you is around, please feel free to comment (or even invite me for an interview at your HQ. I’ll be in SF next month.)

Last year, Marissa concluded her post on the launch of GOOG Universal (5/16/2007) with this sentence :
“While today’s releases are big steps in making the world’s information more easily accessible, these are just the beginning steps toward the universal search vision. Stay tuned!”

She also defined this project as a major component of their strategy:
“Over several years, with the help of more than 100 people, we’ve built the infrastructure, search algorithms, and presentation mechanisms to provide what we see as just the first step in the evolution toward universal search. Today, we’re making that first step available on google.com by launching the new architecture and using it to blend content from Images, Maps, Books, Video, and News into our web results”

One year later, we can clearly witness some major changes that could fundamentally impact the way Google displays search results.

These innovations are great, however, the industry has to be aware of the fact that the SEO game could change. All companies that rely on organic ranking to drive traffic to their site could lose the strong positions they have developed over the years. Likewise, new players could quickly establish themselves on the scene if they figure out how Google’s algorithm is evolving. This creates a lot of business opportunities but also many threats.

Currently my main focus is on video and Google Universal… (because, as mentioned above, it’s my business…and like anyone else in the business, my ego is big and my wallet is important for both myself and my family!).

So lets start with my first topic:

1/ Video content producers and Youtube

Youtube.com holds quite a lot of illegal content, and although you do your best to solve this issue, it cannot be denied that this material drives a ton of traffic to the site. Some people visit the website purely to view the illegal content and this has to be solved.

What about dealing directly with producers who own the rights and produce good content? What about the development of a partnership between Google and producers? Is there any possibility of talking to someone about this matter? What conditions have been established as yet in order to develop a business relationship / partnership with you guys?

Having talked to a number of top level Youtube representatives, the answer to these questions was “99+% of our partners sign up online & upload their videos. Is there a reason why you couldn’t do the same?”

Yes! The reason being that I don’t know what the commercial conditions are and if I am investing in production, it’s partially to gain revenue from it…just like you guys. If you display ads on my content and are thus rewarded for it, why wouldn’t you share a part of the gains with me?

Youtube’s ToS (Terms Of Services) are clear [Link : http://youtube.com/t/terms]: If I don’t deal directly with you before sharing my content on Youtube, then my content definitely wont have any more value:

“However, by submitting User Submissions to YouTube, you hereby grant YouTube a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, sublicenseable and transferable license to use, reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works of, display, and perform the User Submissions in connection with the YouTube Website and YouTube’s (and its successors’ and affiliates’) business, including without limitation for promoting and redistributing part or all of the YouTube Website (and derivative works thereof) in any media formats and through any media channels. You also hereby grant each user of the YouTube Website a non-exclusive license to access your User Submissions through the Website, and to use, reproduce, distribute, display and perform such User Submissions as permitted through the functionality of the Website and under these Terms of Service. The above licenses granted by you in User Videos terminate within a commercially reasonable time after you remove or delete your User Videos from the YouTube Service. You understand and agree, however, that YouTube may retain, but not display, distribute, or perform, server copies of User Submissions that have been removed or deleted. The above licenses granted by you in User Comments are perpetual and irrevocable.”

More over, if I use the service and make money out of it with the embeddable player, I am not respecting the contract:
“D. You agree not to use the Website, including the YouTube Embeddable Player for any commercial use, without the prior written authorization of YouTube. Prohibited commercial uses include any of the following actions taken without YouTube’s express approval:

  • sale of access to the Website or its related services (such as the Embeddable Player) on another website;
  • use of the Website or its related services (such as the Embeddable Player), for the primary purpose of gaining advertising or subscription revenue;
  • the sale of advertising, on the YouTube website or any third-party website, targeted to the content of specific User Submissions or YouTube content;
  • and any use of the Website or its related services (such as the Embeddable player) that YouTube finds, in its sole discretion, to use YouTube’s resources or User Submissions with the effect of competing with or displacing the market for YouTube, YouTube content, or its User Submissions. (For more information about prohibited commercial uses, see our FAQ.)

E. Prohibited commercial uses do not include:

  • uploading an original video to YouTube, or maintaining an original channel on YouTube, to promote your business or artistic enterprise;
  • using the Embeddable Player to show YouTube videos on an ad-enabled blog or website, provided the primary purpose of using the Embeddable Player is not to gain advertising revenue or compete with YouTube;
  • any use that YouTube expressly authorizes in writing.”

So, making money with the aid of Youtube functions is quiet restrictive. If I want to develop a partnership with you, I have to get written authorization before hand…therefore, am I correct in thinking that any producer who does not received this authorization is unable to make money from the content he uploads?


In the meantime if I read ToS for Youtbe’s API [link : http://code.google.com/apis/youtube/terms.html ] you clearly state that producers are important to you and that part of your responsibility is “giving them tools to manage how their content is shared, used to make money and generally displayed”.
Did I read this correctly: “Make money “out of it? In which case, how?

The first paragraph of your Term of Services for Youtube’s API is:


“1) Respecting YouTube’s content creators is very important to us. Whether it’s one dude with a camera or a global media company, people worldwide are using YouTube to share video. Part of our responsibility to that community is giving them tools to manage how their content is shared, used to make money and generally displayed. Sometimes this respect manifests itself in what we do (or don’t) support in these APIs.”

This leads me to assume that you are actually taking us (producers) into consideration, however, being a bit clearer about your intents would help everyone move faster…

More questions tomorrow…

Is Google dancing for videos?

Google DanceI have talked to many specialists in the SEO field over the last few days and we have all noticed that there is a real increase in the number of videos and images appearing in Google’s SERPs.

For most of the experts this is a sure sign that there is a big dance at Google. A dance which could change a lot of things for SEO as we know it. Some even argue that SEO is dead and DAO (Digital Asset Optimization) will take its place.

Is the promise of Universal Search coming true? Just search for “How to tie a tie” in Google and take a good look at the SERP.

SCREENSHOT:

Google SERP with videos
So let’s analyze this page:

There are a total of 11 results with the following:

  • 1 image results (3 images aligned next to each other)
  • 3 video results with thumbnails (two of which do not originate from YouTube, something very new indeed!) and none with a “+” to expand the player within the SERP.
  • 11 text results

This is great news for those who produced the videos that land on Page 1, but bad news for everyone else. The SEO game, which has been pretty much closed for the past few years is now wide open again. What a boom for the SEO market!

I’d really like to know more about the traffic that Google sends directly to Videojug as a result of their videos appearing directly in the SERP (as seen in the “how to tie a tie” example9.

Video SEO (VSEO) is becoming a real area of expertise and its going to be a major challenge for those who do not catch on to this revolution early on.

All you SEO gurus: get ready to tell your clients that they need to produce videos as it will have to become a key component of their e-marketing over the coming months and years. Video will become the tool for getting free traffic to your website in 2008 and beyond. Furthermore it will be a tool that, if used properly, can get you on the first page of Google (the dream of any marketer out there!!!).

Your customers expect video, and Google wants you to deliver it to them, so start producing videos now!

Users clearly LOVE video:

Alexa results Google and YouTube

I’d like to hear what you all have to say about this… Comments please ;-)